![]() But that 256GB MicroSD card is pretty darned full, so good thing I'm using compressed audio data, i.e., FLAC format. I can copy my music library from my laptop to my new 256GB MicroSD card and enjoy my music without having to rip it to MP3 or some other lossless format. It uses a MicroSD card to store music files and my laptop has a MicroSD writer, so I'm good to go. It plays PCM (FLAC, WAV, whatever) up to 32-bit / 384 kHz, as well as DSD stream files (DSF) up to DSD128, so it more than covers my needs. In terms of functionality, it's basic-no touch screen, no WiFi, no Android-but it works well and sounds great. This is a fine-sounding device, built around an AKM4490 DAC chip. Recently, I bought a wonderful standalone digital audio player, the xDuoo X3 II, from Massdrop. I could buy a 1TB SSD but, or I could replace the CD/DVD ROM drive so I can rip the occasional CD and create the occasional DVD-RW backup. Practically speaking, therefore, I'm going to be living with FLAC files on my laptop for now. If I moved from FLAC to WAV, that would more or less double the amount of space needed, which would leave me no room for work (or worse). That leaves me another 200GB for the system and my work, with a bit of a buffer. In total, this collection takes du -s -block-size=G MusicĢ37G of the 480GB provided by my SSD, 237GB is taken up by music. ![]() When I'm away I really enjoy listening to my music collection, which is mostly FLAC, quite a bit of it ripped from CDs, but also higher resolution stuff, generally up to 24-bit / 96 kHz pulse-code modulation (PCM) data, with a small scattering of MP3 files that were the only options for acquiring certain music. As far as I could determine at the time, my best bet, in terms of performance and reliability, was a SanDisk ExtremePro, which especially appealed to me because of the included 10-year warranty. Some years ago, I replaced the 500GB 7200RPM hard drive with a 480GB SSD. I do most of my day-to-day work on my fine, gracefully aging, System76 Gazelle laptop. Do we need compressed audio data?įor me, at least, the answer is a clear yes. These are all interesting points and well worthy of consideration. As in this day and age there is no need to compress CD quality, then why bother? It may be worth having higher bitrate and depth on audio recording/processing, but for listening purposes, CD is as good as you need or indeed can get. In theory, FLAC doesn't, but the mere act of decompression can lead to jitter. MPEG adds features that can be identified with practice. Is there still any need for compressed data? As far as I can tell, no one has ever in a double-blind test been able to recognize anything better than CD-quality uncompressed audio. In response to a recent article, a reader wrote: Return Policy:We accept return of defective product for replacement within 7 days of receipt of the item. The CD will be shipped using a bubble-mailer / high quality protective packaging. ![]() ![]() & International Buyers:Registered Airmail (7-16 working days): US$7.00 for the first CD, US$3.50 for each additional CD after.Payment is expected within five days after the auction closed. "The Absolute Sound Reference Vol.1 CD (Paper Sleeve CD)" MW Coding Process Audiophile Reference CD Released by STS Digital in 2017 Catalog Number: STS 6111142Brand New, Original and Factory Sealed Track Listings: Please see pictures uploaded. Verkäufer: internationalrecords ✉️ (17.280) 100%,Īrtikelnummer: 124678469966 "THE ABSOLUTE SOUND Reference vol.1" STS Digital MW Coding Process WDR CD.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |